Love Themes in Romeo and Juliet

Love Themes in 'Romeo and Juliet' Romeo and Juliet has gotten always connected with affection. The play has become a notable story of affection and energy, and the name â€Å"Romeo† is as yet used to portray youthful sweethearts. Shakespeare’s treatment of affection in the play is mind boggling and multifaceted. He utilizes love in its numerous appearances to string together the key connections in the play. Flighty Love A few characters fall all through adoration rapidly in Romeo and Juliet. For instance, Romeo is enamored with Rosaline toward the beginning of the play, which is introduced as a juvenile captivation. Today, we may utilize the term â€Å"puppy love† to portray this. Romeo’s love for Rosaline is shallow, and no one truly accepts that it will last, including Friar Laurence: Romeo. Thou chidst me oft for adoring Rosaline.Friar Laurence. For hovering, not for adoring, understudy mine. Essentially, Paris’ love for Juliet is a result of custom, not enthusiasm. He has recognized her as a decent contender for a spouse and approaches her dad to orchestrate the marriage. In spite of the fact that this was the convention at that point, it additionally says something regarding Paris’ grave mentality towards adoration. He even admits to Friar Laurence that in his flurry to surge the wedding through he hasn’t examined it with his lady of the hour to-be: Monk Laurence. On Thursday, sir? the time is very short.Paris. My dad Capulet will have it so;And I am nothing delayed to slack his haste.Friar Laurence. You state you don't have the foggiest idea about the ladys mind:Uneven is the course, I like it not.Paris. Radically she sobs for Tybalts death,And in this manner have I little discussed love; Sentimental Love Our exemplary thought of sentimental love is epitomized in Romeo and Juliet. Shakespeare presents this as a power of nature, so solid that it rises above cultural shows. This thought is built up in the play’s preface with the line â€Å"a pair of star-crossed sweethearts take their life.† Maybe Romeo and Juliets love is destiny - there affection is given vast noteworthiness which can, in this manner, topple the social limits of â€Å"fair Verona.† Their adoration is prohibited by the Capulet and Montague families, and Juliet is to wed Paris †Yet, they unavoidably wind up drawn together. Different Types of Love A considerable lot of the kinships in the play are as earnest as Romeo and Juliet’s love for each other. The cozy connections among Juliet and her Nurse, and between Romeo, Mercutio and Benvolio are significant and genuine. They care profoundly for another and secure every others respect †this eventually costs Mercutio his life. This non-romantic love is counterbalanced by the sexual allusions made by certain characters †especially Juliet’s Nurse and Mercutio. Their perspective on adoration is hearty and absolutely sexual, making a compelling diverge from Romeo and Juliet’s sentimentalism.

Using Ruby Environmental Variables

Utilizing Ruby Environmental Variables Condition factors are factors passed to programs by the order line or the graphical shell. At the point when a situation variable is alluded to, its worth (whatever the variable is characterized as) is then referenced. In spite of the fact that there are various condition factors that solitary influence the order line or graphical shell itself, (for example, PATH or HOME), there are likewise a few that straightforwardly influence how Ruby contents execute. Tip:Â Ruby condition factors are like ones found in the Windows OS. For instance, Windows clients might be acquainted with a TMPÂ user variable to characterize the area of the transitory organizer the for the at present signed in client. Getting to Environment Variables from Ruby Ruby has direct access to condition factors by means of the ENV hash. Condition factors can be legitimately perused or written to by utilizing the record administrator with a string contention. Note that composition to condition factors will just affect kid procedures of the Ruby content. Different summons of the content won't see the adjustments in condition factors. #!/usr/receptacle/env ruby# Print some variablesputs ENV[PATH]puts ENV[EDITOR]# Change a variable at that point dispatch another programENV[EDITOR] geditcheat environment_variables include Passing Environment Variables to Ruby To pass condition factors to Ruby, just set that condition variable in the shell. This changes marginally between working frameworks, yet the ideas continue as before. To set a domain variable on the Windows order brief, utilize the set order. set TESTvalue To set a domain variable on Linuxâ or OS X, utilize the fare order. Thoughâ environment factors are a typical piece of the Bash shell, just factors that have been sent out will be accessible in programs propelled by the Bash shell. $ send out TESTvalue On the other hand, if the earth variable might be utilized by the program going to be run, you can characterize any condition factors before the name of the order. The earth variable will be passed onto the program as its run, however not spared. Any further summons of the program won't have this condition variable set. $ EDITORgedit cheat environment_variables include Condition Variables Used by Ruby There are various condition factors that influence how the Ruby mediator acts. RUBYOPT - Any order line switches here will be included to any switches determined the order line.RUBYPATH - When utilized with the - S switch on the order line, the ways recorded in RUBYPATH will be added to the ways scanned when searching for Ruby contents. The ways in RUBYPATH go before the ways recorded in PATH.RUBYLIB - The rundown of ways here will be added to the rundown of ways Ruby uses to scan for libraries remembered for the program with the require strategy. The ways in RUBYLIB will be looked before different registries.

England Government 1500

Britain Government: 1500-1789 Essay Britain had the best kind of government during the time of absolutism (1500-1789) in Europe. Britain was a sacred ruler which implied that the intensity of the ruler (the lord or queen)was constrained by the laws made by the parliament. Britains government was not quite the same as that of most different nations in that the majority of Europeduring that time was managed by supreme rulers, yet England was controlled by a government and the parliament. The connection between the rulers and the parliament once in a while were acceptable and sometimesthey were terrible. For instance, the connection between Charles I and the parliament was downright awful. The parliament constrained Chares I to sign the Petition of Rights (marked in 1628, it precluded the lord from raising expenses without the assent of the parliament) as a result of Charles conduct of attempting to show the nation as an outright ruler to raising charges and detaining individuals without a preliminary, however in the wake of marking the request Charles overlooked it. Later on Charles acquired soldiers to attempt to capture certain individuals from parliament however was ineffective, and soon a common war broke out (1642-1649) between the individuals who bolstered the lord (Cavaliers) and the individuals who upheld the parliament (Roundheads). In any case, the lord lost the war and was attempted and executed by theparliament. The relationship of Henry VIII and the parliament was great. More often than not Henryconsulted the parliament. At the point when he required Parliament to endorse the Act of Supremacy which would legitimize his activities with the Catholic Church. At the point when he required cash to assist him with battling abroad wars he went to the parliament for help. He additionally went to parliament when he needed to raise taxesand parliament for the most part consistently casted a ballot for Henry VIII. This relationship with the parliamentmade him famous with the individuals and popular with the individuals and the parliament too. During this time parliament safeguarded that its own capacity by decreasing the intensity of themonarch. One path was by compelling Charles to sign the Petition of Rights, which should offer right to the parliament and the individuals and breaking point the intensity of the ruler. Parliament additionally had a common war with the ruler and won which guaranteed th at there would be no supreme government and that disposed of government for a long time in England. The parliament constrained William and Mary to sign the Bill of Rights (marked in 1689) which ensured that the ruler brought the parliament consistently, prevented any Catholics from being on the seat, and may different things.

The wars by Timothy Findely is a thought provoking novel Essay Example

The wars by Timothy Findely is an interesting novel Essay The wars by Timothy Findely is an interesting novel. The tale depicts how Wars impacts the lives and brains of customary individuals , it alludes not exclusively to the physical battle that happens during the war yet additionally alludes to the inner mental fights that happens in the psyches of warriors who experienced the impacts of the savagery and barbarism during the World War 1. The tale uncovers the repulsions of war through the character of Robert Ross and his associations with his family, his companions and individuals he went over in his life. The film adjustment of the novel anyway needs detail as though neglects to depict Roberts character, particularly through his connection transport with his dad whom he considered as a tutor and a good example. The film likewise passed up a great opportunity the significant scenes that show Roberts enthusiastic torment and his trouble over the brutality of war. The epic uncovers the life of Robert Ross through his connections. The epic from the earliest starting point shows a solid dad child bond among Robert and his dad Thomas Ross. The film how ever neglects to show any such bond. The epic uncovers that Robert consistently admired his dad and considered his as a coach and a good example. The film portion not show such solid relationship as it portion not have scenes which depict the dad and child relationship and portrayed in the novel. Findely appears from the earliest starting point of the story, exhibits the solid dad child bond among Robert and his dad, Tom. Robert adored and regarded his dad without a doubt, His dad got him through it.(16). Anyway in the film there is no such reference of this sort. Additionally the film portion not show how much looters missed his dad during the war and when his dad appears in Montreal to go from hand to hand a pistol and a hamper of food to him , .seeing his dad had lifted his spirits immeasurably(69). The film adjustment of the novel did an extremely poor activity in indicating an appropriate Roberts relationship with is father in view of which we never observed a signi ficant side of Roberts character. The film likewise neglected to depict a solid picture of Robert in his condition of passionate misery and torment. The film for instance didn't show how Roberts secluded his self during his preparation in Alberta. The tale uncovers that after his sisters passing Robert disregarded a wide range of connections and minded his own business, this is successfully appeared during his preparation at lethbridge, Alberta he needed no connections (28). The film portion not contains any such scene or any reference to his isolation, along these lines forgetting about a significant piece of the novel as it told the best way to what degree Rowenas demise influenced him and how he was managing his misfortune. Likewise, this is the piece of the book where Robert is away from home, alone just because and this is legitimately after Rowenas passing. We will compose a custom exposition test on The wars by Timothy Findely is an intriguing novel explicitly for you for just $16.38 $13.9/page Request now We will compose a custom exposition test on The wars by Timothy Findely is a provocative novel explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer We will compose a custom exposition test on The wars by Timothy Findely is a provocative novel explicitly for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Recruit Writer Along these lines, it helped the peruser watch Robertss torment and enduring, the avoidance of this piece of the book made it difficult for the watcher to perceive how Robert managed his sisters passing and how much blame he had for not staying faithful to his obligation with Rowena. The film when contrasted with the book appeared to pass up a major opportunity the very substance of the novel. The tale worked admirably in demonstrating Roberts torment and his explanation behind joining the military. While in the film needs the detail and articulation. The film didn't show Roberts meeting with Eugene Taffler when he was at preparing. This was additionally a significant part as here Robert meets a man he considers as his good example and starts to respect. This shows Roberts blame had full power over him and he was all the more at that point ready to abandon everything and execute hed found the model he could imitate a man to whom slaughtering wasnt murdering at everything except just tossing .(35). the rejection of this scene hence makes it difficult for the watcher to see Roberts character and his thought processes in joining the military. The film likewise neglects to show Roberts delicate state in of brain as when he goes over Eugene Taffler during his lousetown experience. This part albeit remembered for the film fizzled at its motivation to show Roberts delicate perspective and his loss of guiltlessness. It did exclude the scene where Robert sees Eugene Tafflers extraordinary and dull character and in this way didn't show his of outrage and disillusionment as he considered Eugene as good example and needed to follow his strides. The film succeeded in indicating the impacts of war over individuals and enduring it caused. It demonstrated how the fighters were dealt with and under what conditions they battled. By and by, it neglected to show how the wars influence their perspective. The tale communicated this part every adequately and was exceptionally clear in indicating what experienced their (officers) psyche and how they responded when they confronted the truth of War. The film didn't contain any reference this piece of the novel, along these lines bombed in its essential goal to show the truth of War and the enduring brought about by it.

Explore John Steinbeck’s presentation in Of Mice and Men Essay

Investigate John Steinbeck’s introduction in Of Mice and Men of the way of life and experience of the nomad laborers in 1930’s America. Of Mice and Men is a notable novel composed by John Steinbeck. It was distributed in a profoundly horrendous time, in America. At the point when the Wall Street crash catalyzed the Great Depression and the United States endured a monetary breakdown. Because of the absence of cash there was a significant level of joblessness of people and numerous organizations shut down. Also America experienced horrendous dry spells known as the Dust Bowl in which numerous harvests passed on. The lower the American economy sank the higher the quantities of transient laborers rose, it arrived at around 13 million of every 1932! The main route for some Americans to acquire cash was to go into the open country, where work was hard, perilous, and desolate. They became nomad laborers; the laborers moved here and there for work, to follow the collect across California-USA. Vagrant laborers voyaged alone, Steinbeck’s character George portrays them as the ‘loneliest folks in the world’. They typically went by modest transports, catching a ride rides or just strolling. The compensation was not awful; they earned $2 to $3 every day and furthermore got convenience and nourishment. As they were desolate and didn’t have a lot of they blew their ‘jack’ at the neighborhood bars and ‘cat houses’ each Saturday night, this implied they basically caught themselves in this style of living. I for one believe that Steinbeck decided to concentrate on the lives of vagrant specialists to show the issues confronting America and its kin during that period. Individuals just observed the financial issues, not the distress of the laborers, or the racial segregation of the dark network and I imagine that is the thing that Steinbeck was attempting to appear, the individual impact to a huge number of people. Further more, as Steinbeck had taken a shot at a farm, he felt compassion to the laborers, and depicts their circumstance delicately. George and Lennie are the two primary characters in ‘Of Mice and men’. Steinbeck’s nitty gritty depiction of them permits the peruser to effectively identify with the characters’ solid characters and identifies with their circumstance. George and Lennie jump on quite well; they pay special mind to one another. One of the fundamental things that hold them together is their fantasy; they dislike other farm laborers since they all movement alone, they are the ‘loneliest folks in the world.’ They travel together, they have ‘got a future†¦somebody to converse with that gives a damn’ about them. Lennie acts like a youngster, despite the fact that he is exceptionally solid, ‘Strong as a bull.’ George then again is sharp, wise, and fast. Their characters profoundly coordinate their physical appearance, George is very short, and thin while Lennie is tall, solid, and expansive bore. The relationship, as solid as it seems to be, is very lopsided, George has a ton of power over Lennie, and we know this as ‘they strolled in single file†¦ and even in the open one remained behind the other.’ So in any event, when there was space for them to stroll close to one another, they didn’t, indicating that despite the fact that they are as one they are isolated, forlorn and they have no network to take care of them, nobody that is their equivalent and their companion. The setting of the novel is significant for Steinbeck to pass on his perspectives on how the laborers lived. Steinbeck makes numerous references to light however out the entire of the novel, about how powerless the lighting in the laborers bunk house is as it didn’t light up the corners, and how Curley’s spouse close off the ‘rectangle of daylight in the doorway’ when she enters. This shows how she had ‘cut off’ everything great and unadulterated, as light hues and the sun shows trust; it is practically similar to she is carrying issue with her. In the last section Lennie is shot, executed by George, his demise is unexpected yet the book was composed so we would anticipate it. The portrayal of the setting contains numerous references to light, how the ‘sun left’ the ‘valley’, ‘mountains appeared to blaze†¦increasing brightness.’ The sun is setting the day is finishing, so is the novel and their fantasy; it is all inescapable, including their lives. Steinbeck was a skeptical and the topic of difficulty is exceptionally noticeable all through the novel. John Steinbeck additionally utilizes different depictions connected to the climate to pass on air, similar to the breeze, a ‘far surge of wind sounded†¦ blast drove though†¦ highest points of trees like a wave.’ Compared to section one in a similar setting where there is no stable of wind, it is quiet. In section six we can tell something is fermenting, an aggravation is coming, and something will occur. In section two he depicts the little bunk house, which is the place the entirety of the laborers on the farm live, from this nitty gritty reminiscent portrayal we can perceive how little the laborers really have, and how they rely upon plain items, similar to magazines and their fantasies. The room itself is incredibly straightforward and just gave the necessaries to the laborers. ‘Walls were whitewashed†¦ floors unpainted.’ The d㠯⠿â ½cor in the fundamental four walled rectangular room is modest, and barely extravagant, by utilizing words like, ‘whitewashed’ causes the dividers to appear to be exhausting, cold and hard, as though the paint had quite recently been tossed onto the dividers, practically like no obvious consideration had been placed into the solace of the farm laborers living quarters. Steinbeck alludes to the room resembling a moist jail, ‘in three dividers there were little, square windows, and in the fourth, a strong entrywa y with a wooden latch.’ The ‘solid entryway with a wooden latch’ makes the ‘bunk house’ appear to be encased, kept in obscurity, yet by having a ‘wooden latch’ it causes the space to appear as though it doesn't require ensuring, the assets are not worth being careful. With extremely little windows and a major overwhelming entryway it gives you the possibility of a casket with thick stale air, this thought appears to be progressively similar to reality as you read on and discover that the daylight is stifled with ‘dust’ when it sparkles in the bunk house, which firmly mirrors the claustrophobic environment, it likewise shows how filthy and unhygienic the living zones really are, as ‘flies shot like hurrying stars’, however the light emission light. In one of the bunks in the room there was a splash can to murder bugs; one of the characters in the novel called Candy clarifies that the man who rested there before was simply intentionally perfect. The ‘bunk house’ was clearly exceptionally confined as it contained eight bunks, which means there was no protection, it was a mutual living, and a public life, as they ate, rested and went through 24 hours of their day with one another, not exclusively is there an absence of security, yet none of the nobility that developed grown-up men ought to have. Inside the ‘bunk house’ there was a ‘nailed apple box†¦ so it made two shelves’ over the bunks, this permitted the men to keep their constrained measure of assets in a single region of the room, a little territory of protection. Additionally in the room there was assembled boxes, where the men sit to play a card game, all the furniture is very make-move and modest, speaking to that the men don’t remain there long, they are just transitory specialists. Eager for advancement do racks the laborers had, ‘articles, soap†¦talcum powder, razors and those western magazines that men love to read†¦and their medicines†¦ little vials, brushes; †¦a barely any neck ties.’ All simplicities, yet they treat them like extravagances; they can not have much else as they would not have the option to convey it all around, as they worked. Close to one of the dividers on the bunk house was a ‘black solid metal stove’, in those occasions men didn't cook, it was corrupting. The workers’ cooking for themselves isn't as awful as cleaning for the remainder of the farm, particularly in the event that you were a man. One character on the farm has this activity, Candy. He has what is viewed as a women’s work, yet he does it as he had a physical inability, this is a case of the degrees of chain of importance on the farm. Despite the fact that the entirety of the men are diverse there is a sure classification of men that must be nomad laborers, white, youthful, tough men. Every other person is underneath them in the progressive system, Crooks being dark and handicapped, Candy being disabled, and Curly’s spouse being a lady. Indeed, even Curly feels that he should be all the more genuinely solid to compensate for his stature. The beginning of section two profoundly appears differently in relation to the beginning of part one, part one is a slope bank, which the Salinas River runs by. It is an excellent setting and an exquisite time of day, as it is the late night of a hot day. The stream runs ‘deep’ and it is ‘warm’, the waterway had ‘slipped twinkling over the yellow sands in the daylight before arriving at the tight pool’. To the other side of the waterway was the ‘strong and rough Gabilan mountains’ and on the opposite side the ‘water is fixed with trees’. Steinbeck goes in to explicit detail for this setting, in any event, depicting the ‘lead junctures’, demonstrating exactly how significant and pleasant this spot is. Steinbeck proceeds to enlighten us regarding the creatures ‘skittering’ reptiles and ‘rabbits†¦Ã¢â‚¬â„¢ sitting ‘†¦on the sand in the evening’, the tracks of deer and c oons. The scene changes and the imprints left by man are depicted, the hard beaten way, the heaps ‘made by fires’ and the appendages of a ‘giant’ sycamore ‘worn smooth by the men who have sat on it’. As George and Lennie enter the zone the creature ‘hurried silently f

Flawed yet Insightful Heinleins Response to his Era in Stranger in a Strange Land - Literature Essay Samples

Robert Heinlein’s Stranger in a Strange Land is heralded as a science fiction classic. The winner of several science fiction awards, Heinlein’s novel explores the spiritual journey of Valentine Michael Smith, a Martian who is brought to Earth and taught the ways of humans. Through his journey, Mike, as he is endearingly called, learns about sex, religion, and politics, among many other social institutions, and notices the flaws in the human way of thinking. He introduces humans to the Martian set of beliefs, a set of beliefs that seem to align the 1960’s counterculture movement. That is a testament to Heinlein’s brilliance, and yet, despite being described as an award-winning masterpiece, there are a lot of flaws to Strange in a Strange Land, most noticeably in its plot structure. While Heinlein’s novel ends up exploring Mike’s spirituality and maturity, it starts off as a novel of political intrigue and conspiracy, and these two plotlines ar e never joined in a fluid manner. To wit, Strange in a Strange Land is a classic for its masterful embodiment of the 1960’s counterculture, from its glorification of sex and sin to its criticism of politics and traditional religious institutions, yet it is flawed in its disjointed plot, quick solutions to complicated issues in the plot, and its long and meandering dialogue between characters. The element of Stranger in a Strange Land that most embodies the spirit of the counterculture movement is the glorification of sex, not because all the youth of the 1960’s were promiscuous but because this glorification implies a freedom of expression that mirrored that of youth of the counterculture movement. Heinlein’s novel does not depict sex as something sinful, despite the fact that religion plays heavily into the narrative. Rather, sex is shown as something beautiful that should be explored and used to form greater connections with one another. In Mike’s church, for example, one can have sex with whomever they wished, male or female, single or not, alone with another person or as a big group. Mike best summarizes Heinlein’s views on sex when he says, â€Å"Male-femaleness is the greatest gift we have—romantic physical love may be unique to this planet. If it is, the universe is a poorer place than it could be† (419). He then goes on to describe the union formed through sex as â€Å"a lovely, perfect thing,† (420). This is a complete contrast to how the society that Heinlein lives in views sex. In the 1960’s, sex was something that was extremely suppressed, meant to only be shared between married couples, so for Heinlein to introduce the idea of shamelessly having sex in order to have a deeper connection with someone, even if you were not necessarily married (or ever going to be married) was revolutionary. It was the kind of forward and progressive thinking that is expected in science fiction novels. Because science fiction novels are so unlike the real world, they can depict such radical ideas without consequence; additionally, this aspect of the genre puts science fiction in the perfect position to be a means by which authors can make social commentary on the real world, a fact that Heinlein takes great advantage of. A strong emphasis on social commentary and satire that Heinlein adds to Stranger in a Strange Land is the other brilliant aspect of his work. The novel is filled with criticism of social institutions on Earth, including politics. The process of satirizing the society Heinlein lives in is facilitated by the Mike character. For a time, Mike is observing Earth through an objective, almost academic, point of view as he tries to learn everything he can about humans. The lens of an objective outsider provides the perfect channel for Heinlein to poke fun at the flawed institutions that are so widely accepted by humans. Take the institution of politics, for example. The political system has always been extremely flawed, and yet it is such a huge part of day-to-day life. Political agents cannot be taken at face value. This is best depicted in Chapter 9, which is in the point of view of Joseph Douglas and his wife, Agnes. In this chapter, it is revealed that Douglas, the most powerful man in t he world, lets his wife make most of the political decisions. For example, it was Agnes who suggested they have a fake Man from Mars to talk to the press, and yet, when Douglas brings up that the failed plan was her idea, she said, â€Å"I did not [come up with it]. And don’t contradict me† (73). Douglas, who seems so powerful, is not very powerful at all and is actually very subservient to his wife, even worrying at times about being a disappointment to her. To add more Heinlein’s satirical commentary on the hidden workings of politics is the fact that most of Agnes’s political decisions are made based on one of the least factual approaches possible, astrology. When Mike goes missing, Agnes goes to visit an astrologist who tells her that the â€Å"absence of young Smith is a necessity†¦The important thing is to take no drastic action† (79). Heinlein’s purpose in using the astrology example is to show that even the political leaders who seem so wise and powerful may not actually be acting on the best sources of information. The public believes that they are acting for the common good, but sometimes those figures that people admire are not really making the decisions and sometimes those decisions are made without a lot of evidence that they will actually work. Politicians are often hoping and praying, like the rest of America, that their decisions do not become catastrophic. Tying this back to the counterculture movement, Heinlein’s use of satire emulates the youth’s attitude toward questioning the status quo. The youth are the first to realize that the traditional way of thinking is flawed, and people should be asking questions of the institutions that are so readily accepted. Heinlein’s brilliance is that he channels that questioning attitude and presents it in a way that makes not just the youth question their society but anyone who reads his novel. There is no arguing that Heinlein has a great mind for so creatively pointing out the flaws in society. As a social commentator and satirist, Heinlein is phenomenal. As a storyteller and novelist, he is not as proficient. Take the plot structure, for example. For much of part one, Stranger in a Strange Land seems like it will be a story of political intrigue. There are elements of politicians trying to trick Mike and there is a kidnapping aspect to it. The level of suspense is high, an d it seems like the novel will make a thrilling read at the time. And then, come part two, all of this suspense falls apart and the novel becomes more philosophical with the introduction of Jubal. The true plot of the novel is slowly revealed to be a coming-of-age story for Mike, a journey through his exploration of spirituality. The main conflict of the novel is brought up by Jubal in Chapter 12 when he says, â€Å"We have a personality untouched by the psychotic taboos of our tribe—and you [Jill] want to turn him into a copy of every fourth-rate conformist in this frightened land!† (105). Much of this novel focuses on the debate as to whether Mike should be taught human customs or allowed to form his own opinions on the human way of life, and yet, it would have made a much better novel had it centered on the political conspiracy. Another flaw also comes with the introduction of Jubal, for Jubal engages in long philosophical conversations with the other characters tha t are extremely difficult to follow and make readers lose a lot of interest in the story. Such complicated dialogue was probably not the best choice for a science fiction novel, when part of the genre is primarily geared toward escapism of the horrors of society. Lastly, the final criticism of Heinlein’s work is the quick and easy solution to plotlines the Heinlein uses, namely Mike’s ability to discorporate any challenging plotlines. People come to kidnap him and Jill, and they vanish into thin air. Men with guns come to Jubal’s house and he makes their guns disappear. Whereas some may see this as a show of Mike’s power, this is also an easy remedy for plotlines that would have been intriguing if they had been allowed to play out all the way through. Despite all the flaws with his storytelling methods, there is still no denying that Heinlein is a creative genius. Even though Stranger in a Strange Land was not an effective novel in all aspects, Heinlein managed to make commentary on society and clearly express the attitudes of a movement with an amount of detail that many other writers would not be able to do. Had Heinlein decided to use another means through which to satirize society, it probably would have been more effective, enjoyable, and easier to understand, but the concept itself is still genius and is still deserving of the acclaim that Heinlein and his novel received. Stranger in a Strange Land is considered one of the most famous science fiction novels ever written and deservedly so because there has not been and probably will never be a science fiction novel quite like it ever again.

Duke University FB Page

Duke University FB Page June 29, 2013 Some students posted negative comments about the Supreme Courts decision in the DOMA case on the universitys Facebook page. Duke University has had its share of scandals in recent years. From the Duke University lacrosse case to the Duke senior who wrote her own version of a college thesis by making a PowerPoint presentation on her exploits with Duke basketball, soccer, football, lacrosse, and baseball athletes among others, Duke tops our rankings among highly selective universities when it comes to schools that are used to scandal. Relations between residents of Durham and Duke University have never been particularly strong and allegations of racism at Duke date seem to pop up every few years. Recently, the Supreme Court of the United States overturned the Defense of Marriage Act (DOMA), a federal law passed under the Clinton administration that  allowed states to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages  performed under the laws of other states. Justice Anthony Kennedy, the all-important swing voter, wrote the majority opinion striking down the law that was on the books of our country for far too long. But on the Duke University FB page, some Duke students chose to post negative comments as a reaction to the Supreme Courts decision in the case. Some Duke students, matriculating students, and applicants saw these comments and it has influenced their opinion of the university. The fact is that there are going to be people like this at just about every university in the country and just because a few chose to post on Dukes Facebook page doesnt mean this is the majority opinion on the campus. We highly doubt this to be the case. Is it wrong to support DOMA in our opinion? Of course it is. It was a discriminatory law that had no place in our great country. But you shouldnt not like a university because of a few bad apples who dont believe in equality for all. And, by the way, these comments are no longer visible on the Duke FB page anyway.